Most people believed that the cash value life insurance will cover and help them retire wealthy. But the truth is that the cash value life insurance actually is one of the worst financial products available. Sadly, more than half percent of the life insurance policies sold today are cash value policies. A cash value policy is an insurance product that packages insurance and savings together. Your insurance person will show you wonderful projections, but none of these policies perform as projected.
For example, if a 30-year-old man has $100 per month to spend on life insurance and shops the top 5 cash value companies, he will find he can purchase an average of $125,000 in insurance for his family. The pitch is to get a policy that will build up savings for retirement, which is what a cash value policy does. However, if this same guy purchases 20-year-level term insurance with coverage of $125,000, the cost will be only $7 per month, not $100. All of the $93 per month disappears in commissions and expenses for the first 3 years. After that, the return will average 2.6% per year for whole life, 4.2% for universal life, and 7.4% for the new-and-improved variable life policy that includes mutual funds, according to Consumer Federation of America, Kiplinger's Personal Finance, and Fortune magazines.
Worse yet, with whole life and universal life, the savings you finally build up after being ripped off for years don't go to your family upon your death. The only benefit paid to your family is the face value of the policy, the $125,000 in our example. The truth is that you would be better off to get the $7 term policy and put the extra $93 in a cookie jar! At least after 3 years you would have $3,000, and when you died your family would get your savings. Then, when you are 57 years old and the kids are grown and gone, the house is paid for, and you have $700,000 in mutual funds, you'll become self-insured. That means when your 20-year term is up, you shouldn't need life insurance at all because with no kids to feed, no house payment, and $700,000, your spouse will just have to suffer through if you die without insurance.
For example, if a 30-year-old man has $100 per month to spend on life insurance and shops the top 5 cash value companies, he will find he can purchase an average of $125,000 in insurance for his family. The pitch is to get a policy that will build up savings for retirement, which is what a cash value policy does. However, if this same guy purchases 20-year-level term insurance with coverage of $125,000, the cost will be only $7 per month, not $100. All of the $93 per month disappears in commissions and expenses for the first 3 years. After that, the return will average 2.6% per year for whole life, 4.2% for universal life, and 7.4% for the new-and-improved variable life policy that includes mutual funds, according to Consumer Federation of America, Kiplinger's Personal Finance, and Fortune magazines.
Worse yet, with whole life and universal life, the savings you finally build up after being ripped off for years don't go to your family upon your death. The only benefit paid to your family is the face value of the policy, the $125,000 in our example. The truth is that you would be better off to get the $7 term policy and put the extra $93 in a cookie jar! At least after 3 years you would have $3,000, and when you died your family would get your savings. Then, when you are 57 years old and the kids are grown and gone, the house is paid for, and you have $700,000 in mutual funds, you'll become self-insured. That means when your 20-year term is up, you shouldn't need life insurance at all because with no kids to feed, no house payment, and $700,000, your spouse will just have to suffer through if you die without insurance.
